Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
Minimax

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Sponsor Price Per Token Reach 5000+ developers comparing LLM APIs

125 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in January.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricOlmo 3.1 32B InstructMiniMax M2.1Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.20$0.27 Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.60$1.12 Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct is 38% cheaper overall.

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct Providers

DeepInfra $0.20 (Cheapest)

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.28
SiliconFlow $0.29
Minimax $0.30
AtlasCloud $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct Wins
3
MiniMax M2.1 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32B InstructMiniMax M2.1Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
12.039.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
5.632.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-82.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-87.5-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
53.983.0
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-81.0-
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
65,536
tokens
MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
MiniMax M2.1 has a 67% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricOlmo 3.1 32B InstructMiniMax M2.1Winner
Tokens/second47.2 tok/s66.7 tok/s
Time to First Token0.26s1.88s
MiniMax M2.1 responds 41% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3.1 32B InstructMiniMax M2.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3.1 32B InstructMiniMax M2.1
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAllenaiMinimax
ReleasedJan 2026Dec 2025

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct with:

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct's score of 5.6.
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct has a 65,536 token context window, while MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window.
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct does not support vision. MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision.