Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Sponsor Price Per Token Reach 5000+ developers comparing LLM APIs

125 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in January.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Ministral 3 14B 2512 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Ministral 3 14B 2512
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Context Window
Ministral 3 14B 2512
Speed
Ministral 3 14B 2512

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMinistral 3 14B 2512Mistral Medium 3.1Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.20$0.40 Ministral 3 14B 2512
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.20$2.00 Ministral 3 14B 2512
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 75% cheaper overall.

Ministral 3 14B 2512 Providers

Together $0.20 (Cheapest)
Mistral $0.20 (Cheapest)

Mistral Medium 3.1 Providers

Mistral $0.40 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
1
Ministral 3 14B 2512 Wins
5
Mistral Medium 3.1 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512Mistral Medium 3.1Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
16.321.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.918.3
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
30.038.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
69.368.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
57.258.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
35.140.6
Mistral Medium 3.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Ministral 3 14B 2512
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Ministral 3 14B 2512
262,144
tokens
Mistral Medium 3.1
131,072
tokens
Ministral 3 14B 2512 has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMinistral 3 14B 2512Mistral Medium 3.1Winner
Tokens/second134.2 tok/s94.1 tok/s
Time to First Token0.29s0.40s
Ministral 3 14B 2512 responds 43% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMinistral 3 14B 2512Mistral Medium 3.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMinistral 3 14B 2512Mistral Medium 3.1
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2025

Ministral 3 14B 2512 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Ministral 3 14B 2512 with:

Compare Mistral Medium 3.1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Ministral 3 14B 2512 has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Ministral 3 14B 2512 has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 18.3, compared to Ministral 3 14B 2512's score of 10.9.
Ministral 3 14B 2512 has a 262,144 token context window, while Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window.
Ministral 3 14B 2512 supports vision. Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision.