Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Anthropic
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.6

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins:

  • Supports tool calls

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.6Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$6.00$5.00 Claude Opus 4.6
Output (per 1M tokens)$30.00$25.00 Claude Opus 4.6
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$500000.00 Claude Opus 4.6
Cache Write (per 1M)N/A$6250000.00 Claude Opus 4.6
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Claude Opus 4.6 is 17% cheaper overall.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Providers

Vercel $3.00 (Cheapest)
Amazon Bedrock $6.00

Claude Opus 4.6 Providers

Amazon Bedrock $5.00 (Cheapest)
Google $5.00 (Cheapest)
Anthropic $5.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Claude 3.5 Sonnet Wins
3
Claude Opus 4.6 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.6Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
15.946.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
30.247.6
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
77.2--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
59.984.0
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
38.1--
Aider
Real-world code editing
84.2--
AIME
Competition math
15.7--
Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
200,000
tokens
Max output: 8,192 tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
1,000,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 80% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.6Winner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s0.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s0.00s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.6
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Opus 4.6
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicAnthropic
ReleasedOct 2024Feb 2026

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet with:

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4.6 has cheaper input pricing at $5.00/M tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 has cheaper output pricing at $25.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's score of 30.2.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has a 200,000 token context window, while Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports vision. Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision.