Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Claude Opus 4 vs o1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at math

o1 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
o1
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4
Context Window
o1
Speed
o1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4o1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4o1
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedMay 2025Dec 2024

Claude Opus 4 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

o1 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4 with:

Compare o1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4 has cheaper input pricing at $15.00/M tokens. o1 has cheaper output pricing at $60.00/M tokens.
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 20.5, compared to Claude Opus 4's score of N/A.
Claude Opus 4 has a 200,000 token context window, while o1 has a 200,000 token context window.
Claude Opus 4 supports vision. o1 supports vision.