Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Raifle

Claude Opus 4.5 vs SorcererLM 8x22B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

SorcererLM 8x22B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
SorcererLM 8x22B
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.5
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.5
Speed
Claude Opus 4.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.5SorcererLM 8x22BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$5.00$4.50 SorcererLM 8x22B
Output (per 1M tokens)$25.00$4.50 SorcererLM 8x22B
Cache Read (per 1M)$500000.00N/A Claude Opus 4.5
Cache Write (per 1M)$6250000.00N/A Claude Opus 4.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, SorcererLM 8x22B is 55% cheaper overall.

Claude Opus 4.5 Providers

Amazon Bedrock $5.00 (Cheapest)
Google $5.00 (Cheapest)
Anthropic $5.00 (Cheapest)

SorcererLM 8x22B Providers

Infermatic $4.50 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Claude Opus 4.5 Wins
0
SorcererLM 8x22B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5SorcererLM 8x22BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
43.0--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
42.9--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
62.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
88.9--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
81.0--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
73.8--
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Opus 4.5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Opus 4.5
200,000
tokens
Max output: 64,000 tokens
SorcererLM 8x22B
16,000
tokens
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 92% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Opus 4.5SorcererLM 8x22BWinner
Tokens/second73.1 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.50sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.5SorcererLM 8x22B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.5SorcererLM 8x22B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicRaifle
ReleasedNov 2025Nov 2024

Claude Opus 4.5 Modalities

Input
fileimagetext
Output
text

SorcererLM 8x22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.5 with:

Compare SorcererLM 8x22B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

SorcererLM 8x22B has cheaper input pricing at $4.50/M tokens. SorcererLM 8x22B has cheaper output pricing at $4.50/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 42.9, compared to SorcererLM 8x22B's score of N/A.
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200,000 token context window, while SorcererLM 8x22B has a 16,000 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.5 supports vision. SorcererLM 8x22B does not support vision.