Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.6Llama 3.1 405B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$5.00$4.00 Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$25.00$4.00 Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$500000.00N/A Claude Opus 4.6
Cache Write (per 1M)$6250000.00N/A Claude Opus 4.6
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is 60% cheaper overall.

Claude Opus 4.6 Providers

Amazon Bedrock $5.00 (Cheapest)
Google $5.00 (Cheapest)
Anthropic $5.00 (Cheapest)

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Providers

Hyperbolic $4.00 (Cheapest)
Google $5.00

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
3
Claude Opus 4.6 Wins
0
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Llama 3.1 405B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
46.414.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
47.614.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-3.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-73.2-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.051.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-30.5-
Aider
Real-world code editing
-66.2-
AIME
Competition math
-21.3-
Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Opus 4.6
1,000,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
131,000
tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 87% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Opus 4.6Llama 3.1 405B InstructWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s25.2 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s0.79s
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicMeta-llama
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2024

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 with:

Compare Llama 3.1 405B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $4.00/M tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to Llama 3.1 405B Instruct's score of 14.5.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision.