Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Best Coding Model Leaderboard Find the top LLM for coding by benchmarks and community votes

114 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$3.00$21.00 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Output (per 1M tokens)$15.00$168.00 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Cache Read (per 1M)$300000.00N/A Claude Sonnet 4.6
Cache Write (per 1M)$3750000.00N/A Claude Sonnet 4.6
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 90% cheaper overall.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Providers

Amazon Bedrock $3.00 (Cheapest)
Google $3.00 (Cheapest)
Anthropic $3.00 (Cheapest)

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Wins
3
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
44.351.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
46.448.7
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-99.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-87.4-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
79.990.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-88.9-
GPT-5.2 Pro shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Sonnet 4.6
1,000,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 60% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Tokens/second56.3 tok/s84.1 tok/s
Time to First Token0.80s25.87s
GPT-5.2 Pro responds 49% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2025

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has cheaper input pricing at $3.00/M tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has cheaper output pricing at $15.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6's score of 46.4.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.