Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepcogito
vs
Minimax

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B vs MiniMax M2.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

100 out of our 304 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricCogito V2 Preview Llama 109BMiniMax M2.1Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.18$0.27 Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.59$1.10 Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B is 41% cheaper overall.

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B Providers

Together $0.18 (Cheapest)

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.28
AtlasCloud $0.29
SiliconFlow $0.29
Minimax $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B Wins
0
MiniMax M2.1 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkCogito V2 Preview Llama 109BMiniMax M2.1Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-39.5-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-32.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-82.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-87.5-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-83.0-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-81.0-
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B
32,767
tokens
MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
Max output: 196,608 tokens
MiniMax M2.1 has a 83% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricCogito V2 Preview Llama 109BMiniMax M2.1Winner
Tokens/secondN/A68.1 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.45s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCogito V2 Preview Llama 109BMiniMax M2.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCogito V2 Preview Llama 109BMiniMax M2.1
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepcogitoMinimax
ReleasedSep 2025Dec 2025

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B with:

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has cheaper input pricing at $0.18/M tokens. Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has cheaper output pricing at $0.59/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B's score of N/A.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has a 32,767 token context window, while MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B supports vision. MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision.