Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Minimax
Minimax

DeepSeek V3 0324 vs MiniMax M2.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3 0324 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3 0324
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2.1Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.19$0.27 DeepSeek V3 0324
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.87$0.95 DeepSeek V3 0324
Cache Read (per 1M)$95000.00$30000.00 MiniMax M2.1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3 0324 is 18% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3 0324 Providers

Chutes $0.19 (Cheapest)
ModelRun $0.20
DeepInfra $0.20
AtlasCloud $0.22
SiliconFlow $0.25

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.27 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.29
SiliconFlow $0.29
Minimax $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
DeepSeek V3 0324 Wins
6
MiniMax M2.1 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2.1Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
16.439.5
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
16.432.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
26.082.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
75.287.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
55.783.0
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
35.981.0
Aider
Real-world code editing
55.1--
AIME
Competition math
25.3--
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3 0324
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3 0324
163,840
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
MiniMax M2.1 has a 17% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2.1Winner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s63.7 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s1.45s
MiniMax M2.1 responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax M2.1
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekMinimax
ReleasedMar 2025Dec 2025

DeepSeek V3 0324 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3 0324 with:

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3 0324 has cheaper input pricing at $0.19/M tokens. DeepSeek V3 0324 has cheaper output pricing at $0.87/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to DeepSeek V3 0324's score of 16.4.
DeepSeek V3 0324 has a 163,840 token context window, while MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window.
DeepSeek V3 0324 does not support vision. MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision.