Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Minimax
Minimax

R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricR1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M2.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.29$0.30 R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.29$1.20 R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$30000.00 MiniMax M2.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 45% cheaper overall.

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Providers

NextBit $0.29 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30
Cloudflare $0.50

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
R1 Distill Qwen 32B Wins
2
MiniMax M2.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkR1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M2.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
17.242.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-37.4-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
63.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.9--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
61.584.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
27.0--
AIME
Competition math
68.7--
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
MiniMax M2.5 has a 84% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricR1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M2.5Winner
Tokens/second56.1 tok/s71.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.47s1.67s
MiniMax M2.5 responds 27% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekMinimax
ReleasedJan 2025Feb 2026

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 Distill Qwen 32B with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper input pricing at $0.29/M tokens. R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to R1 Distill Qwen 32B's score of N/A.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B has a 32,768 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not support vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.