Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.29$21.00 R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.29$168.00 R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 99% cheaper overall.

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Providers

NextBit $0.29 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30
Cloudflare $0.50

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
R1 Distill Qwen 32B Wins
5
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
17.251.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-48.7-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
63.099.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.987.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
61.590.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
27.088.9
AIME
Competition math
68.7--
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 92% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Tokens/second56.1 tok/s98.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.47s46.57s
GPT-5.2 Pro responds 75% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekOpenAI
ReleasedJan 2025Dec 2025

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 Distill Qwen 32B with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper input pricing at $0.29/M tokens. R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to R1 Distill Qwen 32B's score of N/A.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B has a 32,768 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not support vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.