Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Minimax
Minimax

R1 vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

R1 wins:

  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricR1MiniMax M2.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.70$0.30 MiniMax M2.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$1.20 MiniMax M2.5
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$30000.00 MiniMax M2.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiniMax M2.5 is 54% cheaper overall.

R1 Providers

Vercel $0.55 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.70
Azure $1.49
Together $3.00

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
R1 Wins
3
MiniMax M2.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkR1MiniMax M2.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
18.842.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
15.937.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
68.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
84.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
70.884.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
61.7--
Aider
Real-world code editing
64.0--
AIME
Competition math
68.3--
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
R1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

R1
64,000
tokens
Max output: 16,000 tokens
MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
MiniMax M2.5 has a 69% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricR1MiniMax M2.5Winner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s71.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s1.67s
MiniMax M2.5 responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1MiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1MiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekMinimax
ReleasedJan 2025Feb 2026

R1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to R1's score of 15.9.
R1 has a 64,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window.
R1 does not support vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.