Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Minimax
Minimax

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M2.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.21$0.30 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.79$1.20 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Cache Read (per 1M)$130000.00$30000.00 MiniMax M2.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is 32% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Providers

DeepInfra $0.21 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.23
SiliconFlow $0.27
Novita $0.27
AtlasCloud $0.30

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Wins
3
MiniMax M2.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M2.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
28.442.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
31.937.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
53.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.6--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
75.184.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
52.9--
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
163,840
tokens
MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
MiniMax M2.5 has a 20% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M2.5Winner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s71.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s1.67s
MiniMax M2.5 responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekMinimax
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's score of 31.9.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.