Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.21$21.00 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.79$168.00 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Cache Read (per 1M)$130000.00N/A DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is 99% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Providers

DeepInfra $0.21 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.23
SiliconFlow $0.27
Novita $0.27
AtlasCloud $0.30

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Wins
6
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
28.451.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
31.948.7
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
53.799.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.687.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
75.190.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
52.988.9
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
163,840
tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 59% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s98.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s46.57s
GPT-5.2 Pro responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekOpenAI
ReleasedSep 2025Dec 2025

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's score of 31.9.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.