Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Minimax
Minimax

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMiniMax M2.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.27$0.30 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.41$1.20 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Cache Read (per 1M)$135000.00$30000.00 MiniMax M2.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is 42% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.40
AtlasCloud $0.40

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
2
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Wins
1
MiniMax M2.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMiniMax M2.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
34.142.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.937.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
96.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
86.3--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
87.184.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
89.6--
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
163,840
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
MiniMax M2.5 has a 20% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMiniMax M2.5Winner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s71.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s1.67s
MiniMax M2.5 responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekMinimax
ReleasedDec 2025Feb 2026

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper input pricing at $0.27/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper output pricing at $0.41/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.9, compared to MiniMax M2.5's score of 37.4.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 163,840 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale does not support vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.