Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Inception
Inception
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Mercury Coder vs MiniMax M2.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mercury Coder wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Mercury Coder
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMercury CoderMiniMax M2.1Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.25$0.27 Mercury Coder
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.00$0.95 MiniMax M2.1
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$30000.00 MiniMax M2.1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mercury Coder is 1% cheaper overall.

Mercury Coder Providers

Inception $0.25 (Cheapest)

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.27 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.29
SiliconFlow $0.29
Minimax $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Mercury Coder Wins
0
MiniMax M2.1 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMercury CoderMiniMax M2.1Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-39.5-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-32.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-82.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-87.5-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-83.0-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-81.0-
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Mercury Coder
128,000
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
MiniMax M2.1 has a 35% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMercury CoderMiniMax M2.1Winner
Tokens/secondN/A60.6 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.73s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMercury CoderMiniMax M2.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMercury CoderMiniMax M2.1
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorInceptionMinimax
ReleasedApr 2025Dec 2025

Mercury Coder Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mercury Coder with:

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mercury Coder has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.95/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Mercury Coder's score of N/A.
Mercury Coder has a 128,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window.
Mercury Coder does not support vision. MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision.