Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Llama 3 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3 70B InstructMiniMax M2.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.51$0.30 MiniMax M2.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.74$1.20 Llama 3 70B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$30000.00 MiniMax M2.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiniMax M2.5 is 7% cheaper overall.

Llama 3 70B Instruct Providers

Novita $0.51 (Cheapest)

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3 70B Instruct Wins
3
MiniMax M2.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3 70B InstructMiniMax M2.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
10.242.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
6.837.4
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
57.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
37.984.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
19.8--
Aider
Real-world code editing
49.2--
AIME
Competition math
0.0--
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3 70B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3 70B Instruct
8,192
tokens
Max output: 8,000 tokens
MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
MiniMax M2.5 has a 96% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3 70B InstructMiniMax M2.5Winner
Tokens/second38.8 tok/s71.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.47s1.67s
MiniMax M2.5 responds 83% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3 70B InstructMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3 70B InstructMiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaMinimax
ReleasedApr 2024Feb 2026

Llama 3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3 70B Instruct with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Llama 3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.74/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Llama 3 70B Instruct's score of 6.8.
Llama 3 70B Instruct has a 8,192 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window.
Llama 3 70B Instruct does not support vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.