Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedJul 2024Sep 2024

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 405B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.5, compared to Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct's score of 4.3.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window, while Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision.