Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Llama 4 Maverick

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 8B InstructLlama 4 MaverickWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.02$0.15 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.60 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 90% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Providers

Nebius $0.02 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.02 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.02 (Cheapest)
Groq $0.05
SiliconFlow $0.06

Llama 4 Maverick Providers

DeepInfra $0.15 (Cheapest)
Vercel $0.20
Groq $0.20
Together $0.27
Novita $0.27

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Wins
7
Llama 4 Maverick Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructLlama 4 MaverickWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
11.718.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
4.915.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
4.319.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
47.680.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
25.967.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
11.639.7
Aider
Real-world code editing
37.615.6
AIME
Competition math
7.739.0
Llama 4 Maverick significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
16,384
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Llama 4 Maverick
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Llama 4 Maverick has a 98% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.1 8B InstructLlama 4 MaverickWinner
Tokens/second162.2 tok/s128.6 tok/s
Time to First Token0.33s0.46s
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct responds 26% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 8B InstructLlama 4 Maverick
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 8B InstructLlama 4 Maverick
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedJul 2024Apr 2025

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 8B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 4 Maverick with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.6, compared to Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's score of 4.9.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a 16,384 token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 4 Maverick supports vision.