Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 8B InstructGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.02$21.00 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.05$168.00 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 100% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Providers

Nebius $0.02 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.02 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.02 (Cheapest)
Groq $0.05
SiliconFlow $0.06

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Wins
6
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
11.751.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
4.948.7
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
4.399.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
47.687.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
25.990.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
11.688.9
Aider
Real-world code editing
37.6--
AIME
Competition math
7.7--
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
16,384
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 96% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.1 8B InstructGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Tokens/second162.2 tok/s98.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.33s46.57s
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct responds 65% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 8B InstructGPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 8B InstructGPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaOpenAI
ReleasedJul 2024Dec 2025

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 8B Instruct with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's score of 4.9.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a 16,384 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not support vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.