Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Sao10k

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.03$0.04 Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.20$0.05 Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 40% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct Providers

Novita $0.02 (Cheapest)
Cloudflare $0.03

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Providers

DeepInfra $0.04 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.05

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct Wins
2
Llama 3 8B Lunaris Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
9.125.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
0.6--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
0.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
20.031.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
19.66.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
1.9--
AIME
Competition math
0.0--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-32.1-
Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins 2 out of 8 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
60,000
tokens
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
8,192
tokens
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct has a 86% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Tokens/second75.9 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.45sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaSao10k
ReleasedSep 2024Aug 2024

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.2 1B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3 8B Lunaris with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 0.6, compared to Llama 3 8B Lunaris's score of N/A.
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct has a 60,000 token context window, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window.
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision.