Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Llama Guard 4 12B vs MiniMax M2.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama Guard 4 12B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Llama Guard 4 12B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama Guard 4 12BMiniMax M2.1Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.18$0.27 Llama Guard 4 12B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.18$0.95 Llama Guard 4 12B
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$30000.00 MiniMax M2.1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama Guard 4 12B is 59% cheaper overall.

Llama Guard 4 12B Providers

DeepInfra $0.18 (Cheapest)
Together $0.20
Groq $0.20

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.27 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.29
SiliconFlow $0.29
Minimax $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama Guard 4 12B Wins
0
MiniMax M2.1 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama Guard 4 12BMiniMax M2.1Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-39.5-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-32.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-82.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-87.5-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-83.0-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-81.0-
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama Guard 4 12B
163,840
tokens
MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
MiniMax M2.1 has a 17% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama Guard 4 12BMiniMax M2.1Winner
Tokens/secondN/A60.6 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.73s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama Guard 4 12BMiniMax M2.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama Guard 4 12BMiniMax M2.1
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaMinimax
ReleasedApr 2025Dec 2025

Llama Guard 4 12B Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama Guard 4 12B with:

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama Guard 4 12B has cheaper input pricing at $0.18/M tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B has cheaper output pricing at $0.18/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Llama Guard 4 12B's score of N/A.
Llama Guard 4 12B has a 163,840 token context window, while MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window.
Llama Guard 4 12B supports vision. MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision.