Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.1 vs Mistral 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Mistral 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Mistral 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
Mistral 7B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.1Mistral 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.27$0.20 Mistral 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.95$0.20 Mistral 7B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00N/A MiniMax M2.1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral 7B Instruct is 55% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.27 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.29
SiliconFlow $0.29
Minimax $0.30

Mistral 7B Instruct Providers

Novita $0.06 (Cheapest)
Mistral $0.14
Together $0.20

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
4
MiniMax M2.1 Wins
0
Mistral 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Mistral 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
39.57.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
32.8--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
82.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.524.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
83.017.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
81.04.6
AIME
Competition math
-0.0-
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
MiniMax M2.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens
Mistral 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Max output: 4,096 tokens
MiniMax M2.1 has a 83% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.1Mistral 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second60.6 tok/s128.7 tok/s
Time to First Token1.73s0.29s
Mistral 7B Instruct responds 112% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.1Mistral 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.1Mistral 7B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedDec 2025May 2024

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Compare Mistral 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Mistral 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Mistral 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window, while Mistral 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision. Mistral 7B Instruct does not support vision.