Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

MiniMax M2.5 vs Devstral Medium

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Devstral Medium wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
Devstral Medium

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.5Devstral MediumWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.40 MiniMax M2.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.20$2.00 MiniMax M2.5
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00N/A MiniMax M2.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiniMax M2.5 is 34% cheaper overall.

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Devstral Medium Providers

Mistral $0.40 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
3
MiniMax M2.5 Wins
0
Devstral Medium Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Devstral MediumWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
42.018.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.415.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-4.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-70.8-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.849.2
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-33.7-
AIME
Competition math
-6.7-
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
Devstral Medium
131,072
tokens
MiniMax M2.5 has a 36% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMiniMax M2.5Devstral MediumWinner
Tokens/second71.0 tok/s112.6 tok/s
Time to First Token1.67s0.44s
Devstral Medium responds 59% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.5Devstral Medium
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.5Devstral Medium
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxMistral AI
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2025

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Devstral Medium Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Compare Devstral Medium with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Devstral Medium's score of 15.9.
MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window, while Devstral Medium has a 131,072 token context window.
MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision. Devstral Medium does not support vision.