Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Mistral Nemo vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMistral NemoGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.02$21.00 Mistral Nemo
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.04$168.00 Mistral Nemo
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Nemo is 100% cheaper overall.

Mistral Nemo Providers

Chutes $0.02 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.02 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.04
Mistral $0.15
Azure $0.30

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Mistral Nemo Wins
3
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMistral NemoGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
25.051.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-48.7-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-99.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
26.487.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
8.790.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-88.9-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
36.1--
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Mistral Nemo
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Mistral Nemo
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 67% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMistral NemoGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Tokens/secondN/A98.3 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A46.57s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral NemoGPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral NemoGPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMistral AIOpenAI
ReleasedJul 2024Dec 2025

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Mistral Nemo does not support vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.