Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Xiaomi

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

100 out of our 304 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

Metricgpt-oss-safeguard-20bMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.07$0.09 gpt-oss-safeguard-20b
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.29 MiMo-V2-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)$37000.00N/A gpt-oss-safeguard-20b
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is 6% cheaper overall.

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b Providers

Groq $0.07 (Cheapest)

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b Wins
0
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

Benchmarkgpt-oss-safeguard-20bMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-30.6-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-25.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-67.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-74.4-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-65.6-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-40.2-
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b
131,072
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

Metricgpt-oss-safeguard-20bMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/secondN/A145.1 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.22s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

Featuregpt-oss-safeguard-20bMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

Propertygpt-oss-safeguard-20bMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIXiaomi
ReleasedOct 2025Dec 2025

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare gpt-oss-safeguard-20b with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to gpt-oss-safeguard-20b's score of N/A.
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.