Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Kimi K2 Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 300 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Haiku wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Kimi K2 Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Context Window
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Speed
Claude 3.5 Haiku

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude 3.5 HaikuKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.80$0.47 Kimi K2 Thinking
Output (per 1M tokens)$4.00$2.00 Kimi K2 Thinking
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.08$0.14 Claude 3.5 Haiku
Cache Write (per 1M)$1.00N/A Claude 3.5 Haiku
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Kimi K2 Thinking is 47% cheaper overall.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Providers

Vercel $0.80 (Cheapest)
Amazon Bedrock $0.80 (Cheapest)
Google $0.80 (Cheapest)

Kimi K2 Thinking Providers

DeepInfra $0.47 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.50
SiliconFlow $0.55
AtlasCloud $0.60
Nebius $0.60

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Claude 3.5 Haiku Wins
0
Kimi K2 Thinking Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
18.7--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
63.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
40.8--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
31.4--
AIME
Competition math
3.3--
Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude 3.5 Haiku
200,000
tokens
Max output: 8,192 tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking
131,072
tokens
Claude 3.5 Haiku has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude 3.5 HaikuKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.00sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 HaikuKimi K2 Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude 3.5 HaikuKimi K2 Thinking
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicMoonshotai
ReleasedNov 2024Nov 2025

Claude 3.5 Haiku Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude 3.5 Haiku with:

Compare Kimi K2 Thinking with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.47/M tokens. Kimi K2 Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.7, compared to Kimi K2 Thinking's score of N/A.
Claude 3.5 Haiku has a 200,000 token context window, while Kimi K2 Thinking has a 131,072 token context window.
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports vision. Kimi K2 Thinking does not support vision.
Advertise with us