Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 300 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Claude Opus 4.1
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.1GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$15.00$21.00 Claude Opus 4.1
Output (per 1M tokens)$75.00$168.00 Claude Opus 4.1
Cache Read (per 1M)$1.50N/A Claude Opus 4.1
Cache Write (per 1M)$18.75N/A Claude Opus 4.1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Claude Opus 4.1 is 48% cheaper overall.

Claude Opus 4.1 Providers

Amazon Bedrock $15.00 (Cheapest)
Google $15.00 (Cheapest)
Anthropic $15.00 (Cheapest)

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Claude Opus 4.1 Wins
1
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
23.651.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-48.7-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-99.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-87.4-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-90.3-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-88.9-
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Opus 4.1
200,000
tokens
Max output: 32,000 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Opus 4.1GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Tokens/second34.7 tok/s60.9 tok/s
Time to First Token1.43s110.75s
GPT-5.2 Pro responds 75% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.1GPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.1GPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedAug 2025Dec 2025

Claude Opus 4.1 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.1 with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4.1 has cheaper input pricing at $15.00/M tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 has cheaper output pricing at $75.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Claude Opus 4.1's score of N/A.
Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200,000 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.1 supports vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.
Advertise with us