Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Best Coding Model Leaderboard Find the top LLM for coding by benchmarks and community votes

114 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Speed
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.13 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.75$0.52 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 24% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.1 Providers

SambaNova $0.15 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.20
DeepInfra $0.21
SiliconFlow $0.27
Novita $0.27

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Providers

Alibaba $0.13 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.15
Phala $0.20
Novita $0.20
SiliconFlow $0.29

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
5
DeepSeek V3.1 Wins
1
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
28.016.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
28.414.3
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
49.772.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.376.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
73.569.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
57.747.6
DeepSeek V3.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.1
32,768
tokens
Max output: 7,168 tokens
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s105.4 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s0.92s
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2025

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.1 with:

Compare Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.13/M tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.52/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.4, compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's score of 14.3.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports vision.