Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash LiteGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.07$21.00 Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.30$168.00 Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is 100% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Providers

Google AI Studio $0.07 (Cheapest)
Google $0.07 (Cheapest)

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Wins
4
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash LiteGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.751.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-48.7-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-99.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
72.487.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
53.590.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
18.588.9
AIME
Competition math
27.7--
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 8,192 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a 62% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash LiteGPT-5.2 ProWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s98.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s46.57s
GPT-5.2 Pro responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 Flash LiteGPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 Flash LiteGPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedFeb 2025Dec 2025

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a 1,048,576 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite supports vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.