Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) wins:

  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)MiniMax M2.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.30Tie
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$1.20 MiniMax M2.5
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00$30000.00Tie
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiniMax M2.5 is 38% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Providers

Google AI Studio $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google $0.30 (Cheapest)

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

3
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Wins
0
MiniMax M2.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)MiniMax M2.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-42.0-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-37.4-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-84.8-
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
MiniMax M2.5 has a 84% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)MiniMax M2.5Winner
Tokens/secondN/A71.0 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.67s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)MiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)MiniMax M2.5
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedOct 2025Feb 2026

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
imagetext

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)'s score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has a 32,768 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) supports vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.