Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$21.00 Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$168.00 Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) is 99% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Providers

Google AI Studio $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google $0.30 (Cheapest)

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

OpenAI $21.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Wins
0
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-51.2-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-48.7-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-99.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-87.4-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-90.3-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-88.9-
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 92% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Tokens/secondN/A98.3 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A46.57s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedOct 2025Dec 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
imagetext

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper output pricing at $2.50/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)'s score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has a 32,768 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) supports vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.