Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025MiniMax M2.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.30Tie
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$1.20 MiniMax M2.5
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00$30000.00Tie
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiniMax M2.5 is 38% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 Providers

Google AI Studio $0.30 (Cheapest)

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 Wins
3
MiniMax M2.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025MiniMax M2.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
25.542.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
22.137.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
56.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.6--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
76.684.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
62.5--
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 has a 80% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025MiniMax M2.5Winner
Tokens/second269.6 tok/s71.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.35s1.67s
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 responds 280% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025MiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025MiniMax M2.5
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 Modalities

Input
imagefiletextaudiovideo
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025's score of 22.1.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 supports vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.