Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M2.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.30Tie
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$1.20 MiniMax M2.5
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00$30000.00Tie
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiniMax M2.5 is 38% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Providers

Vercel $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google AI Studio $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google $0.30 (Cheapest)

MiniMax M2.5 Providers

Minimax $0.30 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.5 Flash Wins
3
MiniMax M2.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M2.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
20.542.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
17.837.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
60.3--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
80.9--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
68.384.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
49.5--
Aider
Real-world code editing
55.1--
AIME
Competition math
50.0--
MiniMax M2.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
MiniMax M2.5
204,800
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a 80% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M2.5Winner
Tokens/second256.6 tok/s71.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.40s1.67s
Gemini 2.5 Flash responds 262% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M2.5
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedJun 2025Feb 2026

Gemini 2.5 Flash Modalities

Input
fileimagetextaudiovideo
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash's score of 17.8.
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 204,800 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash supports vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.