Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5 Nano wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
GPT-5 Nano
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5 Nano
Context Window
GPT-5 Nano
Speed
GPT-5 Nano

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5 NanoQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.08 GPT-5 Nano
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.33 Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Cache Read (per 1M)$5000.00$40000.00 GPT-5 Nano
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GPT-5 Nano is 4% cheaper overall.

GPT-5 Nano Providers

OpenAI $0.05 (Cheapest)
Azure $0.05 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 Providers

Chutes $0.08 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.09
AtlasCloud $0.10
Nebius $0.10
Alibaba $0.13

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
5
GPT-5 Nano Wins
0
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
26.715.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
20.314.2
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
83.766.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
78.077.7-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
67.665.9
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
78.951.5
AIME
Competition math
-72.7-
GPT-5 Nano significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5 Nano
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5 Nano
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
262,144
tokens
Max output: 262,144 tokens
GPT-5 Nano has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5 NanoQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Winner
Tokens/second141.5 tok/s62.4 tok/s
Time to First Token110.10s1.10s
GPT-5 Nano responds 127% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5 NanoQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5 NanoQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2025

GPT-5 Nano Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5 Nano with:

Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5 Nano has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.33/M tokens.
GPT-5 Nano scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 20.3, compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's score of 14.2.
GPT-5 Nano has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5 Nano supports vision. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 does not support vision.