Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-OSS-120b vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

100 out of our 304 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.07 GPT-OSS-120b
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.19$0.27 GPT-OSS-120b
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GPT-OSS-120b is 36% cheaper overall.

GPT-OSS-120b Providers

DeepInfra $0.04 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.04
SiliconFlow $0.05
NCompass $0.05
Novita $0.05

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct Providers

SiliconFlow $0.07 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.07 (Cheapest)
Nebius $0.10
Amazon Bedrock $0.15
Alibaba $0.75

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
6
GPT-OSS-120b Wins
0
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
33.320.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
28.619.4
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
93.429.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
80.870.6
GPQA
Graduate-level science
78.251.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
87.840.3
Aider
Real-world code editing
41.8--
AIME
Competition math
-29.7-
GPT-OSS-120b significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-OSS-120b
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-OSS-120b
131,072
tokens
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
160,000
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has a 18% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructWinner
Tokens/second321.3 tok/s104.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.40s1.53s
GPT-OSS-120b responds 208% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-OSS-120bQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2025

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-OSS-120b with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper output pricing at $0.19/M tokens.
GPT-OSS-120b scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.6, compared to Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's score of 19.4.
GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has a 160,000 token context window.
GPT-OSS-120b does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct does not support vision.