Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Ai21
Ai21
vs
Anthropic
Anthropic

Jamba Large 1.7 vs Claude Opus 4.6

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Jamba Large 1.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Jamba Large 1.7
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Jamba Large 1.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureJamba Large 1.7Claude Opus 4.6
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyJamba Large 1.7Claude Opus 4.6
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAi21Anthropic
ReleasedAug 2025Feb 2026

Jamba Large 1.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Jamba Large 1.7 has cheaper input pricing at $2.00/M tokens. Jamba Large 1.7 has cheaper output pricing at $8.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to Jamba Large 1.7's score of 7.8.
Jamba Large 1.7 has a 256,000 token context window, while Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window.
Jamba Large 1.7 does not support vision. Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision.