Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Ai21
Ai21
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Jamba Large 1.7 vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Jamba Large 1.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Jamba Large 1.7
Speed
Jamba Large 1.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureJamba Large 1.7MiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyJamba Large 1.7MiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAi21Minimax
ReleasedAug 2025Mar 2026

Jamba Large 1.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Jamba Large 1.7's score of 7.8.
Jamba Large 1.7 has a 256,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.