Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Ai21
Ai21
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Jamba Mini 1.7 vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Jamba Mini 1.7 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Jamba Mini 1.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
Jamba Mini 1.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureJamba Mini 1.7MiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyJamba Mini 1.7MiniMax M2.5
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAi21Minimax
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Jamba Mini 1.7 Modalities

Input
Output

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Jamba Mini 1.7 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Jamba Mini 1.7's score of 3.1.
Jamba Mini 1.7 has a 256,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window.
Jamba Mini 1.7 does not support vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.