Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Aion Labs
Aion Labs
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Aion 2.0 vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Key Takeaways

Aion 2.0 wins:

  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureAion 2.0MiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyAion 2.0MiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAion LabsMinimax
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026

Aion 2.0 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Aion 2.0 with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Aion 2.0's score of N/A.
Aion 2.0 has a 131,072 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
Aion 2.0 supports vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.