Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
Allenai

Molmo 2 4B vs Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Molmo 2 4B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Molmo 2 4B
Benchmark Advantage
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
Context Window
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
Speed
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMolmo 2 4BOlmo 3.1 32B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMolmo 2 4BOlmo 3.1 32B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiAllenai
ReleasedUnknownJan 2026

Molmo 2 4B Modalities

Input
Output

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Molmo 2 4B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Molmo 2 4B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Molmo 2 4B has a 36,864 token context window, while Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct has a 65,536 token context window.
Molmo 2 4B supports vision. Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct does not support vision.