Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Olmo 3 32B Think vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3 32B Think wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Olmo 3 32B Think
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3 32B ThinkMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3 32B ThinkMiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiMinimax
ReleasedNov 2025Feb 2026

Olmo 3 32B Think Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Olmo 3 32B Think has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Olmo 3 32B Think's score of 10.5.
Olmo 3 32B Think has a 65,536 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window.
Olmo 3 32B Think does not support vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.