Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
Stepfun-ai

Olmo 3 7B Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Olmo 3 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Step 3.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3 7B InstructStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3 7B InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiStepfun-ai
ReleasedNov 2025Jan 2026

Olmo 3 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 3 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Olmo 3 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to Olmo 3 7B Instruct's score of 3.4.
Olmo 3 7B Instruct has a 65,536 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
Olmo 3 7B Instruct does not support vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.