Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
A
Allenai
vs
A
Allenai

Olmo 3 7B Think vs Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3 7B Think wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Olmo 3 7B Think
Benchmark Advantage
Olmo 3 7B Think
Context Window
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
Speed
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3 7B ThinkOlmo 3.1 32B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3 7B ThinkOlmo 3.1 32B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiAllenai
ReleasedNov 2025Jan 2026

Olmo 3 7B Think Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 3 7B Think has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Olmo 3 7B Think has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Olmo 3 7B Think scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 7.6, compared to Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct's score of 5.6.
Olmo 3 7B Think has a 65,536 token context window, while Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct has a 65,536 token context window.
Olmo 3 7B Think does not support vision. Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.