Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
A
Allenai
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3.1 32B InstructMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3.1 32B InstructMiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiMinimax
ReleasedJan 2026Feb 2026

Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct's score of 5.6.
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct has a 65,536 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window.
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct does not support vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.