Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
Kwaipilot

Olmo 3.1 32B Think vs KAT-Coder-Pro V1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3.1 32B Think wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

KAT-Coder-Pro V1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Benchmark Advantage
KAT-Coder-Pro V1
Context Window
KAT-Coder-Pro V1
Speed
KAT-Coder-Pro V1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkKAT-Coder-Pro V1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkKAT-Coder-Pro V1
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiKwaipilot
ReleasedDec 2025Nov 2025

Olmo 3.1 32B Think Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

KAT-Coder-Pro V1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 18.3, compared to Olmo 3.1 32B Think's score of 9.8.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think has a 65,536 token context window, while KAT-Coder-Pro V1 has a 256,000 token context window.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think does not support vision. KAT-Coder-Pro V1 does not support vision.