Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Olmo 3.1 32B Think vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3.1 32B Think wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorAllenaiMinimax
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2026

Olmo 3.1 32B Think Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Olmo 3.1 32B Think with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Olmo 3.1 32B Think's score of 9.8.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think has a 65,536 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think does not support vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.