Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Olmo 3.1 32B Think vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3.1 32B Think wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorAllenaiOpenAI
ReleasedDec 2025Jan 2026

Olmo 3.1 32B Think Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
GPT-5.2-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to Olmo 3.1 32B Think's score of 9.8.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think has a 65,536 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think does not support vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.