Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Olmo 3.1 32B Think vs GPT-5.4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Olmo 3.1 32B Think wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-5.4 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Olmo 3.1 32B Think
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.4
Context Window
GPT-5.4
Speed
Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkGPT-5.4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 3.1 32B ThinkGPT-5.4
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorAllenaiOpenAI
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2026

Olmo 3.1 32B Think Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.4 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Olmo 3.1 32B Think has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
GPT-5.4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.0, compared to Olmo 3.1 32B Think's score of 9.8.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think has a 65,536 token context window, while GPT-5.4 has a 1,050,000 token context window.
Olmo 3.1 32B Think does not support vision. GPT-5.4 supports vision.