Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Alpindale
vs
Anthropic
Anthropic

Goliath 120B vs Claude Opus 4.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Track Your LLM Costs Across Every Provider Broken down by user, feature, and endpoint

107 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Goliath 120B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Goliath 120B
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.5
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.5
Speed
Claude Opus 4.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGoliath 120BClaude Opus 4.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$3.75$5.00 Goliath 120B
Output (per 1M tokens)$7.50$25.00 Goliath 120B
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.50 Claude Opus 4.5
Cache Write (per 1M)N/A$6.25 Claude Opus 4.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Goliath 120B is 53% cheaper overall.

Goliath 120B Providers

No provider data available

Claude Opus 4.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Goliath 120B Wins
0
Claude Opus 4.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGoliath 120BClaude Opus 4.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-43.1-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-42.9-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-62.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-88.9-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-81.0-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-73.8-
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Goliath 120B
6,144
tokens
Claude Opus 4.5
200,000
tokens
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 97% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGoliath 120BClaude Opus 4.5Winner
Tokens/secondN/A55.2 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.22s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGoliath 120BClaude Opus 4.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGoliath 120BClaude Opus 4.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorAlpindaleAnthropic
ReleasedNov 2023Nov 2025

Goliath 120B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Claude Opus 4.5 Modalities

Input
fileimagetext
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Goliath 120B with:

Compare Claude Opus 4.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Goliath 120B has cheaper input pricing at $3.75/M tokens. Goliath 120B has cheaper output pricing at $7.50/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 42.9, compared to Goliath 120B's score of N/A.
Goliath 120B has a 6,144 token context window, while Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200,000 token context window.
Goliath 120B does not support vision. Claude Opus 4.5 supports vision.